<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ceci n&#8217;est pas un dodo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/242/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/242</link>
	<description>&#34;truly pathetic verbiage&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:12:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Graybeal</title>
		<link>http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/242/comment-page-1#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>John Graybeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyam.net/blog/?p=242#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>ahh, but then you&#039;ll have to resolve the challenge: What constitutes a species?

We are about to experience the vast unfolding of category-making, in animate and inanimate entities, that will lead us to despair of achieving consistency or clarity. Automated intelligence systems of the 22nd century will have much to mine, if the bits are still around.  Linnaean taxonomy will always be around, it will just have lots of company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahh, but then you&#8217;ll have to resolve the challenge: What constitutes a species?</p>
<p>We are about to experience the vast unfolding of category-making, in animate and inanimate entities, that will lead us to despair of achieving consistency or clarity. Automated intelligence systems of the 22nd century will have much to mine, if the bits are still around.  Linnaean taxonomy will always be around, it will just have lots of company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

