<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taxa, Taxon Names and Globally Unique Identifiers in  Perspective.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/526/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/526</link>
	<description>"truly pathetic verbiage"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hyam</title>
		<link>http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/526/comment-page-1#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hyam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyam.net/blog/?p=526#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>Nico Franzsuggests some relevant papers one of which I meant to cite and a couple of others new to me.

1. http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/PhylClassGap.pdf
2. http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/UseTaxConcepts.pdf
3. http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/LetterLinnaeus.pdf
4. http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/ConceptMapping.pdf

http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/nmf.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nico Franzsuggests some relevant papers one of which I meant to cite and a couple of others new to me.</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/PhylClassGap.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/PhylClassGap.pdf</a><br />
2. <a href="http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/UseTaxConcepts.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/UseTaxConcepts.pdf</a><br />
3. <a href="http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/LetterLinnaeus.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/LetterLinnaeus.pdf</a><br />
4. <a href="http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/ConceptMapping.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/publications/ConceptMapping.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/nmf.html" rel="nofollow">http://academic.uprm.edu/~franz/nmf.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hyam</title>
		<link>http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/526/comment-page-1#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hyam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyam.net/blog/?p=526#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1470&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jon Todd&lt;/a&gt; Thanks Jon. Yes I am more or less saying that. My worry is that nomenclature is such a resource hog. People spend a lot of time messing with names and rules and most non-taxonomist (and many taxonomists) don&#039;t know to cite the &#039;usage&#039; sensu Rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1470" rel="nofollow">@Jon Todd</a> Thanks Jon. Yes I am more or less saying that. My worry is that nomenclature is such a resource hog. People spend a lot of time messing with names and rules and most non-taxonomist (and many taxonomists) don&#8217;t know to cite the &#8216;usage&#8217; sensu Rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/526/comment-page-1#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyam.net/blog/?p=526#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>Excellent chapter! I like the term &quot;folksonomy&quot;.  Have I missed something here because your clear explanation shows how the problem isn&#039;t nomenclature after all - its  the lack of taxon circumscription, inadequate taxonomy at its core. Name+usage (sensu author X, date)is a taxon-concept and therefore needs to be labelled with a LSID that underlies the name-sensu X (per Rich Pyle).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent chapter! I like the term &#8220;folksonomy&#8221;.  Have I missed something here because your clear explanation shows how the problem isn&#8217;t nomenclature after all &#8211; its  the lack of taxon circumscription, inadequate taxonomy at its core. Name+usage (sensu author X, date)is a taxon-concept and therefore needs to be labelled with a LSID that underlies the name-sensu X (per Rich Pyle).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
