<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My part in GBIF&#8217;s Role in Persistent Resolvable Identifiers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/571/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/571</link>
	<description>"truly pathetic verbiage"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rod Page</title>
		<link>http://www.hyam.net/blog/archives/571/comment-page-1#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyam.net/blog/?p=571#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>With your notes, and my hastily put together graph (&lt;a href=&quot;http://iphylo.blogspot.com/2009/08/gbif-and-linked-data.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://iphylo.blogspot.com/2009/08/gbif-and-linked-data.html&lt;/a&gt;), I think we&#039;ve managed to get the bulk of what was said out in the open. I suspect my minor victory in getting &quot;GUID&quot; replaced by &quot;persistent identifiers&quot;  was a triumph of timing, as everybody was pretty much exhausted and would do anything to shut me up (and eat cake). Despite this,  I predict that the term &quot;GUID&quot; may have greater stickability than &quot;persistent identifier&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With your notes, and my hastily put together graph (<a href="http://iphylo.blogspot.com/2009/08/gbif-and-linked-data.html" rel="nofollow">http://iphylo.blogspot.com/2009/08/gbif-and-linked-data.html</a>), I think we&#8217;ve managed to get the bulk of what was said out in the open. I suspect my minor victory in getting &#8220;GUID&#8221; replaced by &#8220;persistent identifiers&#8221;  was a triumph of timing, as everybody was pretty much exhausted and would do anything to shut me up (and eat cake). Despite this,  I predict that the term &#8220;GUID&#8221; may have greater stickability than &#8220;persistent identifier&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
